|
Older Family Carers:
Why are they and their adult sons and daughters with
learning disabilities a priority?
|
|
One simple answer would have to be; there are so many of them!
People are living longer; both people with learning disabilities
and their family carers.
-
It is estimated that between 60% and 83%
of people with learning disabilities
live in the community, the majority of them supported by their
families. The
proportion of people being supported in the family home has
not changed
since 1969. ('Valuing People',
DoH. 2001.)
-
A significant number of family carers (estimated
about a third) are now over
70 and many of them are caring on their own. Significant numbers
of people
with learning disabilities are being supported by carers in
their 70's, 80's and
even 90's.
-
Yet, many of these families are not known
to services. Research in the UK, US
and Australia suggests that up to 25% of people with learning
disabilities are
not known to the local learning disability services until their
family care
situation breaks down, due to the ill health or death of their
main carer.
('Family Matters', DoH. 2001)
-
Significant numbers of middle aged men and
women with learning disabilities
will need to be supported when their parents can no longer care
for them.
With increasing longevity this post-parental care phase could
be upward of
twenty years for many men and women with a learning disability.
Planning
for this phase is essential. ('Moving
On Without Parents', Bigby C. 2000.)
|
| Older Family Carers - Why single them out for special
attention? |
|
Although older carers share many characteristics with their younger
counterparts, there are also important differences that have an
impact on their need for services and support.
-
Growing older together:
they are continuing to care and getting older at the s a me
time. Their needs as older people are often not recognised or
catered for.
-
Isolation and limited
support: they are more likely to have reduced networks
as spouse and friends die. They are more likely to be caring
alone.
-
Mutual interdependence:
the relationship with their son or daughter is very important
and this can develop into mutual dependency and very strong
bonds. Many son and daughters take on an increasing number of
caring roles for their parents. This is usually not recognised
or supported.
-
Different experiences
and expectations of services: They have different experiences
of services and the professionals in them than younger families.
Their children were born at a time when there were limited opportunities
for people with learning disabilities. Many families have had
to battle for the most basic services for their sons and daughters,
including education and day services.
-
Independent and going
it alone: They are less likely to ask for help just at
the time that they might need more. Many families have had bad
experiences with services in the past and have little or no
confidence in what they have to offer.
-
Negative experiences
of services: These lifelong carers have often feel they
have had a particularly bad deal from services. They feel judged
and devalued by staff in services.
-
Facing Discrimination:
Research has demonstrated that those people with learning disabilities
known to services who live with older family carers experience
discrimination. They are less likely to receive a service or
have an individualised support plan, compared to other people
with learning disabilities. ('Fair
Shares For All', Walker C. & Walker A. 1995.)
|
| What older family carers say about the support they
are looking for from services |
|
Older family carers stress that it is important to them that the
support they have given their son or daughter is recognised and
valued by services and the staff that work in them. In the report,
'A Crisis Approaching' the concerns of older family carers were
documented. Six key points emerged as important for older family
carers:
-
To be known
by services and have regular contact to both assist with the
planning and enable assistance and support to be sought when
necessary.
-
Provision of information
regarding local services for both short and long term.
-
To ensure older people services and services
for people with learning disabilities are
linked and co-ordinated,
and there is a central contact place for information and help.
-
A non-judgemental
approach by workers and awareness by them of the pressures
experienced by parents and an appreciation of their expertise.
-
Reassurance that help
will be available in a crisis, that their dependent will
be cared for and have support to deal with loss and bereavement.
-
Involvement in planning, assessment, and
decision-making processes regarding their son or daughter.
|
| Developing good practice |
-
Despite a growing recognition of the
key issues there has been limited development of practice wisdom
here in the UK.
-
Of the 146 Local Authorities contacted
as part of the Lifetime of Caring project only 45 responded.
Of these only a few areas had begun to develop a strategic or
comprehensive approach to supporting this group. Many authorities
had identified the issue as an area of concern but had not yet
developed a response.
-
The seminal report "Uncertain Futures"
(Walker and Walker 1998)
urges Local Authorities to think strategically. Suggesting the
local authorities need to give high priority to developing information
systems that can help identify older family carers and create
a useful database to assist service planning.
-
They emphasise the fact that Local
Authorities cannot rely on existing care management systems
as so many of these families are not known to services and the
triggers for assessment of need are not operating effectively.
-
Mainstream carers initiatives cannot
be relied on to provide the targeted support these families
need. Research published by the Norah Fry Centre, "In
Their Own Right" (Robinson
V. & Williams C. 1999.),
showed how poorly served family carers of people with learning
disabilities are. The majority of families were not accessing
their right to a statutory assessment under Carers legislation.
Those few that did experienced no discernible change in their
support a year later.
|
|